Collection Technology, Inc., known in the industry as CTI, is a California collection agency that has recovered debts for schools, lenders, and government programs since 1960. It is a contingency collector rather than a debt buyer, and it holds a General Services Administration contract, which is why so many of its accounts involve federal and guaranteed student loans. Because CTI collects for others, the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act applies to how it deals with you.
Consumer Rights Law Firm PLLC has taken on abusive collectors since 2010 and holds an A+ rating with the Better Business Bureau. Reach us at (877) 700-5790 or start a free case review. Nothing comes out of your pocket, and when a collector breaks the law, the collector pays our fees.
Quick Facts About Collection Technology, Inc. (CTI)
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Full Legal Name | Collection Technology, Inc. |
| Known As | CTI |
| Business Type | Third-party contingency collection agency, not a debt buyer |
| Specialty | Student loans, education debt, and government-related receivables |
| Federal Standing | General Services Administration contract holder; markets FISMA data-security compliance |
| Mailing Address (BBB) | PO Box 7888, Burbank, CA 91510-7888 |
| Operations Address | 10801 6th St, Ste 200, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 |
| Phone | (800) 620-4284 |
| Website | collectiontechnology.com |
| In Business Since | 1960 |
| Industry Memberships | ACA International; California Association of Collectors |
| BBB Accreditation | Not BBB Accredited |
| BBB Rating | Not Rated (BBB reports insufficient information) |
| BBB Complaints (3 years) | 0 shown on the live profile |
| BBB Customer Reviews | 0 shown on the live profile |
| Governing Laws | FDCPA, TCPA, FCRA, and the California Rosenthal Act |
Source: Better Business Bureau, Collection Technology, Inc..
Are the Calls From Collection Technology Legal?
Some are permitted and some are not, and the difference lies in how CTI conducts itself. Contacting you about a genuine student loan or education balance that a school or lender placed with it is allowed, but the FDCPA forbids a range of tactics, and its automated calls to your mobile phone are separately restricted by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. When CTI ignores those boundaries, you gain a claim.
A CTI call may be unlawful if it involves:
- Dialing you outside the 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. window in your local time.
- Auto-dialing or leaving prerecorded messages on your cell without consent.
- Revealing your loan or debt to a parent, roommate, coworker, or reference.
- Threatening garnishment, offset, or legal action that is not accurate or not imminent.
- Misstating the balance, the loan holder, or your right to dispute.
- Pressing forward after you have sent a written demand for validation or a stop.
A point worth stressing is that a defaulted student loan does not strip you of these protections. Even federal loan borrowers, who face collection tools no ordinary creditor has, are still shielded from harassment and deception by a contractor like CTI.
Is This Harassment, and How Often Can Collection Technology Call You?
Yes, an unrelenting call pattern can meet the legal definition of harassment, and there is a measurable line. Regulation F (12 C.F.R. §1006.14) presumes harassment once a collector telephones you more than seven times in a rolling seven-day period about a single account, or calls again within a week of reaching you. Separately, the FDCPA prohibits calls placed with the intent to annoy or abuse, no matter the tally.
When a borrower shows us a phone that will not stop ringing, we reconstruct the sequence first, then look at the content of each call. Repeated warnings about seizing a paycheck or a tax refund, delivered before the loan has even been validated, are the sort of pressure that turns routine collection into a documentable violation. Logging each contact as it lands is what later separates a strong claim from a vague complaint.
CTI is also barred from broadcasting your debt. Under FDCPA §805(b), it may reach out to third parties only to confirm how to find you, and it may never tell them you owe on a loan. A lone call disclosing your balance to a relative can be a violation in itself.
Who Is Collection Technology and Why Are They Calling You?
Collection Technology, Inc. is a Rancho Cucamonga area agency that has spent more than six decades recovering money for institutions rather than buying debt to collect for its own profit. Its clients skew heavily toward higher education and government, and its GSA contract and FISMA security posture signal that it handles sensitive federal and student-loan portfolios. When CTI calls, the balance almost always originated with a college, a student-loan holder, or a government-linked program, not with CTI itself.
That focus explains the shape of the calls. If you attended a school, took out a federal or private student loan, and later fell into default, the account may have been routed to CTI for recovery, sometimes years after you last heard about it. Our pages on student loan debt help, federal student loans, and private student loans explain how each type is collected and where your leverage lies, and our types of student loan page breaks down the differences.
Because student-loan balances often carry added collection costs and years of accrued interest, the figure CTI quotes may look far larger than what you remember borrowing, which makes verifying the account essential.
Is Collection Technology a Scam, and How Do You Verify the Debt?
Collection Technology is a real, long-established agency rather than a scam, but a legitimate collector can still pursue a balance that is inflated, misapplied, or not yours. Student-loan records change hands and servicers often, so confirm the details before you agree to anything:
- Hand over nothing on the first call. Ask for the agency’s name, the current loan holder, the account or loan ID, and the balance, then verify independently instead of paying on the spot.
- Request written validation. Within 30 days of first contact, send a written request for proof of the debt. A concise debt validation letter obligates CTI to document the balance and its authority, and collection should pause until it responds.
- Pin down whether the loan is federal or private. Federal loans open doors like rehabilitation and consolidation, while private loans have their own statute of limitations and defenses. Check your federal loans at studentaid.gov.
- Question added collection costs. Ask for an itemization separating principal, interest, and any collection fees, and compare it to your original loan terms.
- Confirm the contact details. The verified phone is (800) 620-4284 and mail routes through PO Box 7888, Burbank, CA 91510. Pressure to pay instantly by card, wire, or gift card is a fraud signal.
- Review your credit reports. Confirm what is reported and challenge any error under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, using our credit report dispute guide.
BBB Complaints Against Collection Technology
Better Business Bureau profile for Collection Technology, Inc. shows no complaints in the current three-year window and lists the company as Not Rated because the BBB has insufficient information to grade it. The agency is not BBB accredited, and its BBB file dates to 2007. A blank BBB record, however, does not mean borrowers have no grievances.
Student-loan disputes rarely travel through the BBB. Borrowers are far more likely to file with the CFPB, which maintains a public database where debt collection and student-loan servicing are recurring categories, or with the Federal Student Aid ombudsman for federal loans. If Collection Technology has contacted you improperly, creating that paper trail matters. You can file directly through the company’s BBB complaint page, submit a complaint to the CFPB, and report the calls to the FTC.
What Do Consumer Reviews Say About Collection Technology?
Verified consumer reviews for Collection Technology are essentially absent, which is typical for an agency that works institutional and government portfolios rather than consumer-facing accounts. Its BBB profile carries zero customer reviews, and searches of ComplaintsBoard, Trustpilot, ConsumerAffairs, Sitejabber, PissedConsumer, and Ripoff Report did not surface reviews that can be reliably confirmed as this Burbank-listed, Rancho Cucamonga based agency rather than a similarly named business.
We flag that honestly, because a scarce review trail is not evidence of good behavior and is not evidence of misconduct. The record that matters is your own account history and call log. If you have dealt with Collection Technology, posting a verified complaint with the CFPB or the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation builds the public record for the next borrower who searches this name.
Lawsuit Against Collection Technology
1. Fairchild v. Collection Technology Incorporated
Fairchild v. Collection Technology Incorporated, No. 2:15-cv-00326, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington on November 25, 2015. Melody Celeste Fairchild sued Collection Technology Incorporated under 15 U.S.C. § 1692, the FDCPA. The docket identifies the case as an FDCPA action against the collection company.
Source: Justia
Collection Technology Tactics Borrowers Report
Borrowers describe a familiar sequence once a student-loan account reaches a recovery agency, and recognizing it helps you document a problem. Common patterns tied to student-loan collection include:
- Threats of administrative garnishment or tax offset, invoked to pressure a quick payment on a federal loan before the borrower has verified anything.
- Sticker-shock balances, where years of interest and added collection costs make the demand dwarf the original loan.
- Confusion over the loan holder, because federal loans move between servicers and guaranty agencies, leaving borrowers unsure who actually owns the debt.
- Rushed payment setups, where a borrower is pushed to authorize withdrawals before understanding rehabilitation or consolidation options.
In many of the cases we review, the strongest evidence is the borrower’s own timeline of calls set against the loan paperwork showing what was really owed and to whom.
Your Legal Rights When Collection Technology Is Calling
- FDCPA (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act): Governs Collection Technology as a third-party collector. It bans harassment, false threats, after-hours calls, third-party disclosure, and misrepresenting a balance, and it entitles you to written validation. Damages reach up to $1,000 plus actual damages and attorney fees. See our FDCPA page.
- California Rosenthal Act: Because CTI operates from California, this statute reinforces the FDCPA and adds its own penalties. See our Rosenthal Act page.
- TCPA (Telephone Consumer Protection Act): Restricts automated and recorded calls to your cell without consent, which you can revoke anytime, and carries $500 to $1,500 per illegal call. See our TCPA page.
- FCRA (Fair Credit Reporting Act): Protects you from inaccurate reporting of a defaulted or disputed loan and requires a 30-day investigation of disputes.
- Federal student-loan rights: Federal borrowers may have access to loan rehabilitation and consolidation to cure a default, along with dispute and offset-review procedures that private creditors do not offer.
Collection Technology Violation Comparison
| Violation | Example on a Student-Loan Account | Statute | Remedy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calls before 8:00 a.m. or after 9:00 p.m. | An early or late call about a defaulted loan | FDCPA §805(a)(1) | Up to $1,000 per violation |
| Disclosing the loan to a third party | Telling a roommate or reference you owe a student debt | FDCPA §805(b) | Up to $1,000 per violation |
| False threat of garnishment or legal action | Threatening wage seizure without the authority to do so | FDCPA §807 | Up to $1,000 per violation |
| Repeated calls to harass | More than 7 calls in 7 days on one account | FDCPA §806; Reg. F, 12 C.F.R. §1006.14 | Presumption of harassment; up to $1,000 |
| Continued contact after a written cease request | Calls that resume after a certified stop letter | FDCPA §805(c) | Up to $1,000 per call after receipt |
| Misstating the balance or collection costs | Demanding inflated fees not permitted by the loan terms | FDCPA §808 | Actual and statutory damages; attorney fees |
| Automated or recorded call to a cell without consent | A robocall to your mobile number | TCPA, 47 U.S.C. §227 | $500 to $1,500 per call |
| Inaccurate reporting of a defaulted loan | A wrong balance or status reported to the bureaus | FCRA §623 | Actual and statutory damages; attorney fees |
Can You Sue Collection Technology for Harassment?
Yes. If Collection Technology violated the FDCPA, the TCPA, or the FCRA, you can bring a claim and recover money, with the agency covering your attorney fees under those laws’ fee-shifting provisions. California borrowers can add a Rosenthal Act claim that carries its own penalties, and each unlawful robocall to your cell can be worth $500 to $1,500 under the TCPA.
You do not need a large financial loss to have a case. A stretch of calls after 9:00 p.m., a loan disclosed to a coworker, a false garnishment threat, or an ignored validation request can each stand on its own. Because the law places the fees on the collector that broke it, we take these matters at no upfront cost to you.
What To Do Next: 5 Steps to Stop Collection Technology Calls
Step 1: Build a call record and verify the loan type. Log the date, exact time, and number of every call, whether it was live or recorded, and what was said, then confirm at studentaid.gov whether the loan is federal or private, since your options differ sharply.
Step 2: Demand written validation. Mail a debt validation letter by certified mail requesting the loan holder, an itemized balance, and proof of CTI’s authority to collect. Collection should pause until it responds, and keep the certified receipt.
Step 3: Explore cure options before you pay under pressure. For a federal loan, ask about rehabilitation or consolidation rather than agreeing to a rushed withdrawal. For a private loan, check the statute of limitations before making any payment that could restart the clock.
Step 4: Send a cease-and-desist if the calls persist. Once Collection Technology receives a written cease-and-desist letter, it may generally contact you only to confirm it is stopping or to note a specific legal step. Every call after that is a separate, provable violation.
Step 5: File complaints and call a consumer attorney. File with the CFPB, the Federal Student Aid ombudsman, and the FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov, dispute any credit errors, then call Consumer Rights Law Firm PLLC at (877) 700-5790 or request a free case review. If Collection Technology broke the law, the fees fall on the agency, so you pay nothing.
CONSUMER RIGHTS LAW FIRM, PLLC
Consumer Rights Law Firm, PLLCÂ is a law firm that specializes in helping clients who are facing harassment from debt collectors in any form, including telephone communication. Contact a legal professional to stop Collection Technology debt collection harassment.
If you are interested in learning more about how to safeguard yourself and prevent even more Collection Technology debt collection harassment, call us at (877)700-5790 for immediate assistance or visit our website.
Success Stories
- Matthew was so helpful. This company was amazing. We were being hassled up to 10 times a day for a bill that was less than $1000. The person who had our account was nasty and EXTREMELY unprofessional. I sought out help from Consumer Rights Law Firm and within 45 days we had relief. So grateful to Matt for his help and professionalism. He kept us informed with every step and fulfilled everything that he said. Very grateful. Thank you
- I had an excellent experience with this law firm and want to give a special shout-out to Matthew for his outstanding work. From the very beginning, Matthew was professional, knowledgeable, and genuinely committed to helping me understand my rights. He communicated clearly every step of the way, answered all my questions, and made a stressful situation much easier to handle. Thanks to his dedication and expertise, I felt supported and confident throughout the process. I highly recommend this firmâespecially Matthewâto anyone in need of top-notch consumer rights representation!
- Scott was amazing and very professional! He was very knowledgeable and took the time to explain everything and answer my questions. We were dealing with a very unprofessional debt collector. Im thankful I looked into our rights and what we could do and found Consumer Rights Law Firm. Dont ever let a debt collector try to bully you and tell you that you have no rights because you do!

