Receivables Outsourcing Phone Harassment?
Is Receivables Outsourcing (RO) calling you? Stop Receivables Outsourcing phone harassment. Do they threaten to take legal action or garnish your wages? Are they calling you at all hours or several times a day? Are they telling your family and neighbors that you owe a debt? If so what they are doing is illegal and needs to stop. You have the legal right to stop RO
Is Receivables Outsourcing a Scam? Better Business Bureau Information
According to the Better Business Bureau website, Receivables Outsourcing has been in business for 22 years. There have been 17 complaints filed against RO with the BBB.
Receivables Outsourcing Better Business Bureau
Who is Receivables Outsourcing Collection Agency?
Receivables Outsourcing is a third-party debt collector located in Beachwood, Ohio. RO has been a party to a Federal Court case over 15 times, including a notable case decided in the eighth district (Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County). They have been accused of violating consumer’s rights and illegal and harassing communication tactics to attempt to coerce a payment from the harassed consumer.
Address: 3401 Enterprise Parkway
#401
Beachwood, OH 44122
Phone: (216) 378-6200
The employee worked at Receivables Outsourcing during the period when the alleged harassment occurred. On the day of the final incident, the employee arrived for her scheduled shift.
Receivables Outsourcing Collection Tactics and Fair Debt Collection Practices
If Receivables Outsourcing engages in any of the following tactics, you may have a case:
Receivables Outsourcing Phone Numbers
216-378-6200, (216) 378-6200, 2163786200
If the answer is yes, then you are receiving calls from a known RO number. You may be a victim of RO phone harassment. The list above is not all the numbers that RO uses. The calls can be from a different number and it still be Receivables Outsourcing calling you. Contact our office right away so we can start the process to stop RO from calling you illegally. Above all, no one should live with harassment!
Alleged Sexual Harassment Offenses
Receivables Outsourcing, a well-known collection agency, has faced serious allegations involving alleged sexual harassment offenses within its workplace. In a notable case, an employee complained that a fellow employee, Mark Blackwell, engaged in a pattern of harassing conduct over a six-week period. The alleged harassment occurred both inside and outside the workplace, with the alleged harasser telling the employee she “smelled good” and repeatedly asking her out, despite her clear refusal and her statement that she did not mix business with pleasure.
The situation escalated when the alleged harasser joined a conversation and made sexually suggestive remarks about the employee’s body, contributing to an abusive working environment. The final incident occurred on a Friday as employees were clocking out. At a traffic light, the alleged harasser pulled up alongside the employee’s car and called her a “strawberry”—a derogatory slang term for a woman selling sexual favors, often in exchange for crack cocaine or money to buy crack cocaine. He then offered her $10 to perform a sex act, a blatant example of actual propositioning that, while occurring outside of work hours, was directly related to their workplace relationship.
The employee testified that this harassing conduct was unwelcome, based on sex, and sufficiently severe to create an illegal hostile work environment. She maintains that being called a “strawberry” and being offered money for sexual favors by a fellow employee constituted sexual harassment and sex discrimination, fundamentally affecting the terms and conditions of her employment. Despite presenting evidence of the alleged harassment, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Receivables Outsourcing, finding the conduct insufficient to establish a hostile work environment under Title VII. The employee appealed, arguing that genuine issues of fact remained regarding whether the harassing conduct was sufficiently severe and pervasive.
The Better Business Bureau (BBB) has documented complaints against Receivables Outsourcing, underscoring the importance of fair debt collection practices and the need for employers to address allegations of unlawful discriminatory practices. In this case, the employee’s experience with the company lawyer—who was unresponsive and did not engage when she tried to speak—highlights how supervisory personnel can sometimes fail to address serious allegations. Although the manager immediately returned her call and promised corrective action, the employee was subsequently dismissed during her probationary period for walking off the job, raising further questions about the company’s response to her complaint.
The court noted that not all workplace conduct described as harassment rises to the level of an unlawful discriminatory practice, but also recognized that a single act of actual propositioning, especially when it involves a sex act and is accompanied by derogatory language, can create a hostile work environment. This case serves as a reminder that employers must take all allegations of sexual harassment seriously, ensure that policies and procedures are in place to address such complaints, and take prompt corrective action to prevent further incidents. For employees, it underscores the importance of reporting harassment and understanding their rights under fair debt collection and employment laws.
Is RO a scam? No, Receivables Outsourcing has been in business for 22 years.
Can Receivables Outsourcing garnish my wages? Yes, RO can garnish your wages on a Federal Student loan or if they obtain a judgment from the courts.
Can RO sue me? Yes, RO can sue you so long as the debt is within the statute of limitations
Can RO report my debt to the collection bureaus?
Can RO arrest me?
The following is a sample list of complaints filed against Receivables Outsourcing in the past and can be found on Pacer.org.
2:10-cv-02115-JHS Croocker v. Receivables Outsourcing
1:11-cv-01333-JKB Kestler v. Receivables Outsourcing
1:98-cv-01057-PRM Thomas v. Receivables Outsourcing
8:16-cv-02403-PWG Daughtry v. Receivables Outsourcing
1:17-cv-11543-NLH-AMD Nelson v. Receivables Outsourcing
In several of these cases, employees presented evidence and provided testimony regarding alleged harassment. In some instances, plaintiffs refiled complaints after initial dismissals. Additionally, in certain cases, the courts found that there remained genuine issues of material fact, preventing summary judgment.
is a law firm that specializes in helping clients who are facing harassment from debt collectors in any form, including telephone communication. Rather than suffer alone, contact our office to begin the process to stop the Receivables Outsourcing harassment. Our office has been assisting consumers since 2010. We have an A+ rating with the Better Business Bureau.
If you are interested in learning more about how to safeguard yourself and prevent harassment from Receivables Outsourcing. call us at (877)700-5790 for immediate assistance or visit our website at www.consumerlawfirmcenter.com
https://consumer.ftc.gov/articles/debt-collection-faqs
https://consumerlawfirmcenter.com/universal-fidelity-lp-phone-harassment/
https://consumerlawfirmcenter.com/viking-client-services-phone-harassment/
https://consumerlawfirmcenter.com/frontline-asset-strategies-phone-harassment/
https://consumerlawfirmcenter.com/accelerated-receivables-management-inc-phone-harassment/
https://consumerlawfirmcenter.com/lyon-collection-services-phone-harassment/
https://consumerlawfirmcenter.com/nra-group-phone-harassment/
https://consumerlawfirmcenter.com/chase-receivables-phone-harassment/
