Account Liquidation Services Phone Harassment?

100% Free App

With the Casevox mobile app, you can easily document debt collection activity, upload voicemails, and organize your complaint details all in one place. Share information directly with our legal team so we can act quickly on your behalf.

Free Case Review, you will never be charged legal fees. We will respond within 15 minutes via text or email.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name(Required)

100% Free App

With the Casevox mobile app, you can easily document debt collection activity, upload voicemails, and organize your complaint details all in one place. Share information directly with our legal team so we can act quickly on your behalf.

Most people who hear from Account Liquidation Services are not being chased over a credit card. They are being chased over a check that bounced. The Decorah, Iowa agency built its business on returned-check recovery, and that origin changes the rules of the game, because Iowa law is specific about what a check collector may tack on and how it has to go about collecting. Before you send money to settle a bounced check, it is worth knowing that the fees a collector can legally add are capped, and that a check dispute is not automatically a criminal matter.

Consumer Rights Law Firm PLLC has spent since 2010 forcing collection agencies to follow the rules and paying clients when they do not. Talk to us at (877) 700-5790 or through our free case review. When a collector breaks the law, our fee comes out of their pocket, not yours.

Quick Facts About Account Liquidation Services

DetailInformation
Legal NameAccount Liquidation Services, Inc.
SpecialtyAccounts receivable and returned-check recovery
OwnerTrace Hable
Founded1996
StructureIowa S corporation, roughly 8 employees
Office304 W Water Street, PO Box 174, Decorah, IA 52101-1730
Phone(563) 382-1560
Toll-Free(877) 382-4357
Websiteaccountliquidation.com
BBB StatusNot accredited, A+ rating
BBB Complaints (3 years)2, both resolved
Governing LawFDCPA, plus Iowa’s bad-check and consumer-credit statutes

Can Account Liquidation Services Legally Do This?

Contacting you about an unpaid check or account is squarely within the law. What Iowa and federal rules police is how far the agency goes and what it adds to the bill. Since Account Liquidation Services collects debts owned by the merchants and businesses that hired it, rather than debts it created, it answers to the full Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), and Iowa’s own collection and bad-check statutes sit alongside it.

The behavior that turns a lawful collection effort into a claim usually falls into these buckets:

  • Padding a bounced check with fees Iowa law does not authorize.
  • Hinting that you will be arrested or criminally charged to scare a payment out of you.
  • Placing the account on your credit report without ever sending you notice of it.
  • Ringing your phone several times a day, or after nine at night, as two Better Business Bureau complaints against the agency describe.
  • Shrugging off a written request to verify the debt and collecting anyway.

The first thing our attorneys check in an Account Liquidation Services matter is the arithmetic on the check itself, because the gap between the original check amount and the total being demanded is where a lot of returned-check collectors get into trouble.

What Account Liquidation Services Actually Does

Account Liquidation Services opened in Decorah in 1996 and runs as a small Iowa S corporation with an owner, Trace Hable, and a staff of roughly eight. On its own site it describes itself as a full-service accounts-receivable and returned-check recovery agency, and that self-definition is the useful part: this is a shop that specializes in collecting money owed to businesses, with a heavy emphasis on checks that were written and then dishonored by the bank.

If the agency is calling you, the underlying debt most likely began at a local or regional merchant, a store, a clinic, a utility, or a service provider that took a check, watched it bounce, and turned the file over. The company does not own that debt. It works it for the business that does, which means the details you need, the name of the original payee, the true amount, and any fees, are documented somewhere you cannot see over the phone. Pulling that into writing is the move that protects you.

The Bad-Check Rules Iowa Actually Applies

This is where an Account Liquidation Services case differs from an ordinary collection call, so it deserves close reading. Iowa does not let a check collector invent charges. Under Iowa Code section 554.3512, the holder of a dishonored check may claim a service charge of thirty dollars. Alternatively, under section 554.3513, the holder can pursue statutory damages of up to three times the face value of the check in a civil lawsuit, but that recovery is capped so it does not exceed the check amount by more than five hundred dollars, and it is available only if the holder first mailed a written demand at least thirty days before filing suit. The law is explicit that you cannot stack both remedies for the same check.

Two things follow from that. First, if the balance Account Liquidation Services is demanding is far larger than your check plus a modest service charge, and no lawsuit with a proper thirty-day demand is behind it, the extra may be an amount the FDCPA does not permit a collector to charge under section 808. Second, the treble-damage remedy lives in a courtroom, not in a phone script, so a caller quoting triple damages as though it were a settled bill is getting ahead of the law.

When a Bounced Check Feels Like a Criminal Threat

Writing a check that bounces can be a crime in Iowa, and many county attorneys run their own bad-check diversion programs that send out letters on official letterhead. That reality gets exploited. A private collector like Account Liquidation Services is pursuing a civil debt, not a criminal case, and it has no power to arrest you, file charges, or send you to jail. If a caller blurs that line, implying prosecution or jail to pressure a payment, that is the kind of false and intimidating statement the FDCPA’s section 807 was written to stop.

The tell is the letterhead and the sender. A genuine criminal bad-check notice comes from a county attorney’s office, references a specific statute and case, and offers a diversion class. A civil collection demand comes from the agency itself. If Account Liquidation Services is the sender and the message is dressed up to sound criminal, treat that as a red flag, not a reason to panic.

Is Account Liquidation Services a Scam or a Real Business?

Account Liquidation Services is a real business with a nearly thirty-year history, a named owner, a physical Decorah office, and an A+ letter grade at the Better Business Bureau, so a correctly identified call from it is not a phantom-debt scam. The caution here is narrower: verify that the check or account it references is actually yours and that the amount squares with Iowa’s fee limits before you agree to anything.

The reviews paint a small agency that is hard to reach. Its Better Business Bureau file shows a strong A+ rating and only two complaints in three years, but its ratings elsewhere are weaker, a mediocre showing on Google and a low average on Birdeye, and a 2025 reviewer summed up a common gripe with a blunt line about the company: “They dont answer their phones. Or return calls.” That accessibility problem is worth planning around, because it means everything you send should go in writing, by certified mail, so you are not depending on a callback that may never come.

What the Complaint Record Shows

Account Liquidation Services has a limited public complaint history, but the available records provide insight into the types of issues consumers have reported. Two Better Business Bureau complaints and one public review highlight concerns involving communication practices, difficulty reaching the company, and problems resolving collection accounts.

In a November 2023 BBB complaint, a consumer alleged that Account Liquidation Services contacted them repeatedly, writing:

“This business calls numerous times a week, sometimes past 8pm, sometimes twice or more a day and I want it stopped ASAP.”

The company responded that it would request removal of the consumer’s phone number from its records.

Another BBB complaint came from a consumer who was attempting to resolve collection accounts that were affecting their ability to obtain a home loan. The consumer stated:

“I have been trying to get ahold of them to pay off several debts on my credit that is causing me to not be able to get a home loan. I need these paid off immediately. I have left voicemail after voicemail and have been calling at least 3 times per day. This is getting ridiculous!!”

Unlike the first complaint, this consumer’s concern was not unwanted contact but the difficulty of reaching the company to resolve an account.

A separate public review described similar communication frustrations, with the consumer writing:

“Will not answer phone, return voicemails, email address is undeliverable unable to resolve balance they have my credit score held hostage.”

These complaints and reviews represent individual consumer experiences and do not by themselves establish legal violations. However, they show recurring themes involving challenges with communication, account resolution, and credit-related concerns. Consumers researching Account Liquidation Services can review complaint records through the Better Business Bureau and compare available reports in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database.

Read more here: BBB Complaints BBB Reviews

Has Account Liquidation Services, Inc. Been Sued?

Yes. Account Liquidation Services, Inc. has been named as a defendant in multiple consumer lawsuits, including cases alleging violations under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Below are two examples of lawsuits filed against the company.

1. Shepherd v. Account Liquidation Services, Inc. (2014)

  • Filed by: Donna Shepherd
  • Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri
  • Claim: The plaintiff sued Account Liquidation Services, Inc. under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1692.
  • Outcome: The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case without prejudice on February 5, 2015, meaning the case was closed but not decided on the merits and could potentially be refiled.
  • Source: Pacermonitor

2. Rowe v. Account Liquidation Services, Inc. (2016)

  • Filed by: Jennifer Rowe
  • Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois
  • Claim: The plaintiff brought an FDCPA-related lawsuit against Account Liquidation Services, Inc. alleging violations of federal debt collection laws.
  • Outcome: The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case, and the court entered a dismissal with prejudice on June 30, 2016, meaning the case could not be brought again.
  • Source: Pacermonitor

When clients report issues involving Account Liquidation Services, Inc., this pattern of FDCPA lawsuits suggests concerns around debt collection practices that have previously led consumers to seek legal remedies, making it important to review the specific communication history and circumstances of each complaint.

Your Rights Against Account Liquidation Services

  • FDCPA (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act): Governs Account Liquidation Services fully as a third-party collector. It bars harassment, false or intimidating statements including hollow criminal threats, and it forbids collecting fees the law or your agreement does not authorize under section 808. It also gives you a right to written validation.
  • Iowa Code sections 554.3512 and 554.3513: These fix what a check collector can recover, a thirty-dollar service charge, or court-awarded statutory damages capped near five hundred dollars over the check amount, following a thirty-day written demand, but not both.
  • Iowa Consumer Credit Code, Chapter 537: Iowa’s consumer-credit statute includes debt-collection provisions that prohibit unfair, deceptive, and harassing collection conduct against Iowa consumers.
  • TCPA (Telephone Consumer Protection Act): Covers automated or prerecorded calls and texts to your cell phone without consent, at $500 to $1,500 apiece.
  • FCRA (Fair Credit Reporting Act): Requires accurate reporting and gives you the right to dispute a collection entry, including one placed on your report without notice or for a check you already covered.

Where a Check Collector Can Cross the Line

The grid lists conduct the law prohibits and the exposure it carries. These are examples of what the statutes forbid for any collector, not findings against Account Liquidation Services.

ConductIllustrationLawExposure
Charging unauthorized fees on a checkDemanding far more than the check plus a $30 service charge, with no lawsuit behind itFDCPA §808; Iowa Code 554.3512Up to $1,000 plus actual damages
Threatening criminal charges to collectImplying arrest or prosecution over a civil check debtFDCPA §807Up to $1,000 plus actual damages
Reporting a debt without noticePlacing a paid or disputed check on a credit report unannouncedFCRA §623Actual and statutory damages plus fees
Calling after 9 p.m.Contact past nine at night, as a BBB complaint describesFDCPA §805(a)(1)Up to $1,000 per violation
Excessive call volumeSeveral calls a day on one accountReg. F, 12 C.F.R. §1006.14Harassment presumed; up to $1,000
Ignoring a validation demandContinuing to collect after a written request for proofFDCPA §809Collection frozen until proof is sent
Robocalling a cell without consentAuto-dialed or recorded calls to your mobileTCPA, 47 U.S.C. §227$500 to $1,500 per contact
Misstating the balanceQuoting treble damages as a settled bill outside of courtFDCPA §807; Iowa Code 554.3513Up to $1,000 plus actual damages

A Practical Plan for Handling the Calls

  • Reconstruct the check. Pin down the original check amount, who you wrote it to, and whether it was ever covered. Then compare that figure against what Account Liquidation Services is demanding. If the difference is more than a thirty-dollar service charge and no lawsuit exists, question the extra in writing.
  • Demand validation by certified mail. Because the agency is known to be hard to reach by phone, skip the calls and send a written validation request within thirty days of first contact to 304 W Water Street, PO Box 174, Decorah, IA 52101-1730, asking for the name of the original merchant, a copy of the returned check, and an itemized breakdown of every charge. Collection must halt until they respond.
  • Do not let a criminal-sounding threat rush you. If the pressure involves prosecution or jail, remember the agency cannot bring criminal charges. Ask for everything in writing and note exactly what was said, because a false criminal threat is itself actionable.
  • Fix the credit report. If a check collection appears on your credit file, especially one you were never notified about or already paid, dispute it in writing with the credit bureaus and attach proof of payment. That starts a thirty-day investigation clock under the FCRA.
  • Report it and get counsel. File with the FTC, the CFPB, and the Iowa Attorney General, or reach Consumer Rights Law Firm PLLC at (877) 700-5790 or through our free case review. A violation shifts the legal bill to the collector.

Consumer Rights Law Firm, PLLC

Consumer Rights Law Firm PLLC is a law firm that specializes in helping clients who are facing harassment from debt collectors in any form, including telephone communication. Rather than suffer alone, contact our office to begin the process to stop their harassment. Our office has been assisting consumers since 2010. We have an A+ rating with the Better Business Bureau.

If you are interested in learning more about how to safeguard yourself and prevent harassment from Account Liquidation Services. call us at (877) 700-5790 for immediate assistance or visit our website.

Success Stories

  • Words can’t express how incredibly grateful we are for the work that Consumer Rights Law Firm did for us. It was a case of stolen identity that had turned into a 2 year nightmare. Our contact Scott was very supportive and went to bat for us without asking for a dime. In less than 6 months they were able to get fraudulent credit card charges dropped and get our credit restored. I would HIGHLY recommend them to anyone facing similar circumstances. Reach out to them now. You won’t regret it.
  • This company really helped so much. They never asked me for any money out of pocket. I paid nothing! They were so nice and helpful. They called me personally assured me they would handle everything at no cost to me. They communicated every step of the way and were always available for any questions I had. I will recommend them to anyone
  • Scott and Derek did the impossible. I went from freaked out and terrified to settled in a matter of 2 days at a payment I could actually afford… Barely but I can afford it LOL. My best advice is to not mess up a loan but if you do these are the guys to contact.
Attorney Derek DePetrillo

Attorney Derek DePetrillo graduated from the Massachusetts School of Law in 2007 and was admitted to practice law in the State of Massachusetts in 2007. Mr. DePetrillo is also licensed in many federal jurisdictions across the United States.

Mr. DePetrillo has been assisting consumers with consumer protection since 2010. Mr. DePetrillo’s main area of practice is under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Mr. DePetrillo has filed countless lawsuits and arbitration claims against debt collectors and banks. Mr. DePetrillo fights for the little people who have had their rights violated and need a helping hand to guide them through the stressful times of debt collection.

Disclaimer: The information contained in these articles is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Reading or relying on this content does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. Because every legal matter is unique, you should consult a qualified attorney regarding your specific circumstances before making any legal decisions.