Rushmore Service Center presents an unusual problem today: state licensing records show the company ended operations around 2022, yet old First PREMIER account records and current online profiles can still make the Rushmore name appear active.
Historically, Rushmore Service Center was a third-party collector that handled some First PREMIER Bank credit-card accounts through a relationship involving PREMIER Bankcard. That history matters because a current caller using the Rushmore name should be identified before you discuss payment or assume the historical company is contacting you.
The first questions are who is calling, what account they claim to represent, and how that account reached the current collector.
Is Rushmore Service Center Still in Business and Really Calling Me?
Public licensing records indicate that Rushmore Service Center ended collection operations around late 2021 to early 2022.
Maryland licensing records stated that the entity ended operations and closed the company. Colorado records show its collection license was surrendered in December 2021, while Florida records show its authority to transact business was withdrawn in April 2022.
In our practice, a current Rushmore-related call would begin as an identity question. We would look at the voicemail, caller ID, collection letter, creditor name, payment instructions, and account number before treating the communication as activity by the historical Rushmore Service Center entity.
Is It the Same Company as Rushmore Servicing?
No. A 2026 federal court record states that Rushmore Service Center and Rushmore Loan Management Service d/b/a Rushmore Servicing were unrelated and shared no common ownership.
This distinction is especially important because current BBB complaint narratives under the Rushmore Service Center profile include mortgage, escrow, foreclosure, and insurance issues that appear connected to mortgage servicing rather than the verified credit-card collection business.
Why Is Rushmore Service Center Contacting Me About a First PREMIER Account?
Rushmore historically collected some First PREMIER Bank credit-card accounts placed with it through PREMIER Bankcard.
Federal litigation describes First PREMIER Bank as the card issuer, PREMIER Bankcard as performing collection-related functions, and Rushmore as a third-party collector working on placed accounts.
Clients with older First PREMIER files can easily mistake those names for different creditors. We usually separate the original statements, Rushmore correspondence, and any PREMIER Bankcard documents before deciding who performed each role and whether the present caller fits that historical account chain.
Did Rushmore Buy My First PREMIER Debt?
The documented relationship supports third-party collection, not proof that Rushmore purchased the First PREMIER debts involved in the verified cases.
That distinction matters because authority to collect an account is different from ownership of the account.
How Can I Verify an Old Rushmore Account Before Paying?
Start by matching the current demand to the original First PREMIER account and determining who now claims collection authority.
| Record | What It Can Show |
| First PREMIER statements | Original account and historical balance |
| Rushmore letter | Whether Rushmore actually handled the account |
| PREMIER Bankcard correspondence | Role of the collection affiliate |
| Current collection notice | Who presently claims authority |
| Payment history | Whether the claimed balance reconciles |
| Cardholder agreement | Whether arbitration terms may apply |
One of the first things we would want to understand is what happened after Rushmore stopped operating. If a different collector now demands payment, its documents should explain its connection to the historical account rather than leaving the consumer to assume that Rushmore’s former authority simply continued.
What Did Consumers Report About Rushmore Service Center Calling Their Workplaces?
Historical CFPB complaints alleged that Rushmore contacted workplaces or employers after consumers had asked that such contact stop.
Those complaints are allegations, not findings that Rushmore violated the law. Rushmore’s documented First PREMIER collection arrangement included direct telephone collection, but the complaints do not establish what internal process caused the alleged workplace contacts to continue.
BBB currently gives Rushmore Service Center a D- rating and lists it as not accredited. BBB displays complaints from the preceding three-year period, but several current narratives concern mortgage servicing. Those mortgage complaints should not be attributed to this company because the federal record identifies the mortgage servicer as a separate entity.
When someone tells us that Rushmore called a workplace, the number of calls is only part of the file. The more useful sequence is when the workplace number was identified, when the consumer asked that calls stop, what happened afterward, and whether employer records or voicemail confirm those later contacts.
What Records Matter Most for Workplace Calls?
Call logs, employer telephone records, voicemails, written stop requests, certified-mail receipts, and contemporaneous notes are the most useful records.
A general statement that the calls continued is less useful than a dated chronology showing notice followed by additional contact.
Has Rushmore Service Center Been Sued Before?
Yes. The most important verified case is George v. Rushmore Service Center, LLC, which explains how Rushmore handled First PREMIER accounts and how creditor identification became disputed.
George alleged that a Rushmore collection letter improperly identified PREMIER Bankcard in connection with a First PREMIER credit-card debt. The case also documented Rushmore’s commission-based collection arrangement and contemplated use of collection letters and direct telephone contact.
The District Court compelled arbitration, an arbitrator ruled for Rushmore, and the Third Circuit later directed dismissal because George lacked Article III standing. The appellate court did not decide that Rushmore’s letter complied with the FDCPA on the merits.
Court opinion: George v. Rushmore Service Center, LLC
For us, George is most useful as an account map. It shows why the First PREMIER statement, PREMIER Bankcard role, Rushmore letter, and cardholder agreement may all matter in the same file. That historical structure also gives us something concrete to test when a present caller claims authority over an old Rushmore-related account.
What Should I Document If the Calls Continue?
Document who called, when the call occurred, what number was used, what account was mentioned, and what you told the caller.
Keep:
- caller ID screenshots
- voicemails
- work and personal call logs
- complete collection letters
- envelopes
- emails or texts
- payment instructions
- stop-contact requests
- First PREMIER account records
We often find that a consumer remembers the substance of a difficult call but not the date when the collector learned it was a workplace number or when a request to stop was made. Preserving that timing can make the communication history much easier to evaluate later.
How Can I Contact Rushmore Service Center About My Account?
The historical Rushmore Service Center contact information identified for the Sioux Falls operation is below, but an old business listing does not establish that a present caller is the same entity.
| Item | Details |
| Historical address | 3820 N. Louise Avenue, Sioux Falls, SD 57107 |
| BBB-listed phone | (866) 950-7300 |
| Operating status | State records indicate operations ended around 2022 |
A current caller should be authenticated through the account information and creditor relationship rather than an old phone or address listing alone.
When Should I Get Legal Help About Rushmore Service Center Calls?
Legal review may be useful when the caller’s identity or authority is unclear, workplace calls allegedly continued after a stop request, or a present collector cannot explain how it obtained an old Rushmore account.
At Consumer Rights Law Firm PLLC, we start by separating three questions that can easily become mixed together in a Rushmore file: who is calling now, whether the debt traces to a First PREMIER account that Rushmore historically handled, and what happened during the calls themselves.
We may examine the current letter or voicemail, First PREMIER statements, PREMIER Bankcard correspondence, old Rushmore notices, payment history, workplace telephone records, and any request to stop workplace contact. Early review can help prevent an unrelated Rushmore entity or unexplained post-closure collector from being treated as the historical company without supporting records.
Phone: +1 (877) 700-5790
Email: help@consumerlawfirmcenter.com
Website: consumerlawfirmcenter.com
Address: 133 Main Street, Second Floor, North Andover, MA 01845
BBB: CRLF Better Business Bureau Profile
Success Stories
I was harassed by a collection agency who refused to even tell me what it was about. They were very nasty. I contacted Consumer Rights Law firm. They reviewed my case and immeadiately took over. They stopped the calls and dealt with the collection agency. Consumer Rights promised I would have no out of pocket expenses and they kept their word. They kept in constant contact with me and explained everything. Consumer Rights Law firm did a great job. They are very professional and easy to speak with and contact. They settled my case favorably for me within 30 days. I highly recommend Consumer Rights Law firm for any consumer needs you may have or any problems where you are unfairly treated. They are very honest and responsive to your needs.
Consumer Rights Law Firm was excellent to work with! They are very professional, knowledgeable, timely, and thorough. From submitting the online consultation form to signing a settlement offer took only 20 days. Highly recommend them!
I admit and I was skeptical when I first called but after talking to Matt, I knew that him & his team knew what they were doing. I had a creditor calling me & making threats. They also called my family. I felt I HAD to pay them to make them stop. Matt informed me that what they were doing was illegal. He got the calls to stop, got my debt cleared, & I didn’t have to pay a cent to them. On top of that, they were able to get me money BACK! They exceeded my expectations & I will be using them again & refer them 1000 times to anyone/everyone.
Rushmore Service Center FAQs
Is Rushmore Service Center still operating?
State licensing records indicate that Rushmore Service Center ended collection operations around 2022.
Is Rushmore Service Center the same company as Rushmore Servicing?
No. A federal record states that the debt collector and the similarly named mortgage servicer were unrelated.
Why would an old First PREMIER card be connected to Rushmore?
Rushmore historically collected some First PREMIER Bank credit-card accounts placed through PREMIER Bankcard.
Is PREMIER Bankcard the same as First PREMIER Bank?
No. The litigation describes First PREMIER Bank as the issuer and PREMIER Bankcard as performing collection-related functions.
Did Rushmore Service Center own my debt?
The documented First PREMIER relationship supports third-party collection, not verified ownership of those debts.
Why might PREMIER Bankcard appear on a Rushmore letter?
PREMIER Bankcard participated in the collection relationship involving First PREMIER accounts, and its identification became an issue in George.
What should I do if someone uses the Rushmore name today?
Confirm the caller’s identity, original creditor, account number, and current authority before discussing payment.
What matters if my workplace was called?
Preserve when the workplace was contacted, when you asked that calls stop, and what contact occurred afterward.
Can a First PREMIER arbitration agreement affect a dispute?
Yes. Arbitration provisions in First PREMIER card agreements affected several verified cases involving Rushmore.
How can Consumer Rights Law Firm PLLC assist with Rushmore Service Center calls?
The firm can examine caller identity, First PREMIER account records, workplace-call evidence, and current collection authority to determine what happened.
