The Accounts Retrievable System, Inc., often shortened to ARS, is a Bellmore, New York collection agency founded in 1987 and led by president Harold Rosenblatt. It is not a typical caller-and-letter operation; it markets itself as a judgment collection agency, meaning it specializes in suing on assigned debts and enforcing court judgments through New York’s post-judgment tools. Because it collects consumer debts owed to others, the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act applies, and New York layers on some of the strongest debtor protections in the country.
Consumer Rights Law Firm PLLC has defended consumers against collectors since 2010 and holds an A+ rating with the Better Business Bureau. Call (877) 700-5790 or open a free case review. You pay nothing, and a collector that breaks the law pays our fees.
Quick Facts About The Accounts Retrievable System, Inc.
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Full Legal Name | The Accounts Retrievable System, Inc. |
| Known As | ARS |
| Business Type | Judgment collection agency that sues on assigned debts and enforces judgments |
| Address | 2050 Bellmore Avenue, Bellmore, NY 11710-5643 |
| Phone | (516) 783-6566 |
| Fax | (516) 783-5389 |
| Website | accountsretrievable.com |
| Founded | 1987 |
| President | Harold Rosenblatt |
| BBB Accreditation | BBB Accredited since 1993 |
| BBB Rating | A+ |
| Documented Cases | ARS as Assignee of Chase v. Djoleto; Matter of Accounts Retrievable Sys. v. Conway (N.Y. App. Div. 2011) |
| Governing Laws | FDCPA, New York CPLR Article 52, New York debt collection rules, TCPA, FCRA |
Source: Better Business Bureau, The Accounts Retrievable System, Inc..

What Does a Judgment Collection Agency Like ARS Actually Do?
It sues debtors and then uses court-backed powers to collect, which is a sharper threat than ordinary phone dunning. Rather than simply calling about a balance, ARS takes assigned accounts to court, obtains a money judgment, and then enforces it under New York’s Civil Practice Law and Rules. Its own materials describe serving clients such as banks, credit unions, retailers, manufacturers, universities, and law firms, and it has appeared in New York courts as the assignee of a creditor pursuing a consumer.
For you, that changes the stakes. Once a judgment exists, the agency can serve a restraining notice to freeze a bank account, issue an income execution to garnish wages, and use information subpoenas to locate your assets. If ARS is contacting you, the first question is whether it is trying to collect before suit, is suing you now, or already holds a judgment, because each stage carries different deadlines and defenses. Our page on the types of debts it may pursue offers a starting point.
Has The Accounts Retrievable System Been to Court Over Debt Collection?
Yes, and public records show it both suing consumers and litigating enforcement matters on appeal. In one New York action, the company appeared as The Accounts Retrievable System, Inc., as assignee of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A., suing an individual defendant to collect a credit card balance, which illustrates how it takes over bank accounts and pursues them in court. Standing in a creditor’s shoes as an assignee is a core part of its model.
Source: UniCourt
The agency’s name also appears in a published appellate decision, Matter of Accounts Retrievable Sys. v. Conway, 83 A.D.3d 1052 (N.Y. App. Div., 2d Dept. 2011), a New York Appellate Division ruling that arose from its enforcement work. Published appellate involvement is notable for a collection agency and confirms that ARS actively litigates judgment-collection disputes rather than merely sending letters. Court outcomes turn on their own facts, and being a party to litigation is not itself a violation, but this record tells you the agency will use the courts, so your response should be built for that.
Source: Justia.
Are the Calls and Filings From ARS Legal?
They can be lawful, but a judgment collector has powerful tools that must be used within strict rules, and New York enforces them tightly. ARS may contact you about a real consumer debt and may enforce a valid judgment, yet the FDCPA bars deceptive or abusive collection, and New York law governs every enforcement step. When the agency overstates its rights, freezes exempt funds, or pursues a debt that is too old or not yours, you gain a claim.
Conduct that can be unlawful includes:
- Threatening to garnish wages or freeze accounts before a judgment actually exists.
- Restraining or levying protected funds like Social Security, SSI, veterans benefits, or pensions.
- Suing or threatening suit on a consumer debt past New York’s statute of limitations.
- Failing to serve you properly and then taking a default judgment, sometimes called sewer service.
- Calling before 8:00 a.m. or after 9:00 p.m., or disclosing your debt to third parties.
- Misstating the balance, the original creditor, or your right to dispute.
- Continuing to contact you after a written cease-and-desist.
A key point for New York consumers: even after a judgment, the law shields a baseline amount in your bank account and exempts many income sources, so a freeze does not mean the money is automatically gone.
Is This Harassment, and How Often Can ARS Call You?
Yes, repeated abusive calls can meet the legal definition of harassment, though with this agency the pressure often comes through the courts as much as the phone. Regulation F (12 C.F.R. §1006.14) presumes harassment when a collector calls more than seven times in seven days about one account, or calls again within a week of speaking with you, and the FDCPA separately bans calls meant to abuse or oppress.
Because ARS litigates and enforces, we examine the full picture when a client comes in: the call log, any summons or judgment, and any restraining notice or income execution. A demand backed by a threat to seize wages or accounts that the agency is not yet entitled to take is the kind of overreach that supports a claim. Keeping copies of every call note and every court paper is essential here.
The agency also may not reveal your debt to others. Under FDCPA §805(b), it may contact third parties only to locate you, never to disclose the balance, and New York rules reinforce that limit.
Who Is The Accounts Retrievable System and Why Are They Contacting You?
ARS is a New York collection company that has operated from Bellmore since 1987 under Harold Rosenblatt, focusing on litigation and judgment enforcement for commercial and institutional clients as well as consumer accounts assigned to it. Rather than a business you dealt with, it is the agency your creditor hired, or the assignee that took over your account, which is why its name may be unfamiliar even when the underlying debt is not.
The accounts it works include credit card balances assigned by banks, retail and installment debts, and other obligations placed for collection or already reduced to judgment. If a bank charged off your account and assigned it, or a creditor won a judgment and turned to ARS to collect, that is the typical route. Because these matters often involve older debts and court records, both the age of the debt and whether it is truly yours deserve careful review before you pay or ignore anything.
Is The Accounts Retrievable System a Scam, and How Do You Verify the Debt?
It is a legitimate, BBB-accredited New York agency rather than a scam, but legitimacy does not mean every claim is accurate or every enforcement step is proper, so verify before acting. Take these steps:
- Do not ignore court papers, and do not overshare on calls. If you were served, note the deadline; if it is a call, ask for the agency name, the original creditor, the account number, and the balance, without confirming details or paying on the spot.
- Check the age of the debt. New York shortened the statute of limitations on consumer credit debt to three years, so a suit or threat on an older account may be unlawful. See our statute of limitations by state guide.
- Demand written validation. Send a debt validation letter requiring proof of the debt and the chain of assignment from the original creditor.
- Protect exempt funds. If a bank account is frozen, identify Social Security, SSI, veterans benefits, pension, or other exempt deposits, which New York law shields from a levy.
- Confirm the contact. The verified address is 2050 Bellmore Avenue, Bellmore, NY 11710, and the phone is (516) 783-6566. Demands for gift cards, wire transfers, or instant payment to avoid arrest are fraud signals.
- Review your credit. Check your reports and dispute any error under the Fair Credit Reporting Act using our credit report dispute guide.
What Should You Do If ARS Sued You or Froze Your Account?
Act immediately, because deadlines in a New York collection case are short and enforcement moves fast. If you were served with a summons, file a written answer with the court within the time allowed, since ignoring it typically leads to a default judgment that the agency can then enforce. In your answer, you can require ARS to prove it owns the account through the full assignment chain, raise the statute of limitations, and challenge the amount.
If a judgment already exists and your bank account was restrained, you can assert your exemptions. New York’s Exempt Income Protection Act automatically shields a baseline amount in your account and protects many income sources, and you can file an exemption claim to release wrongly frozen funds. For wage garnishment, an income execution is capped and cannot reach income below a protected threshold. Moving quickly to claim exemptions or to vacate a default, especially if you were never properly served, can undo much of the damage.
What Do BBB Complaints and Reviews Show About ARS?
They show a long-accredited agency with a strong BBB grade, which is a different profile from many collectors. The Better Business Bureau has accredited The Accounts Retrievable System since 1993 and rates it A+, and its posted complaint volume is modest. That rating reflects the company’s engagement with the BBB and its longevity, not a guarantee that any particular lawsuit, restraining notice, or call complied with the law.
Because ARS operates through the courts, the more telling records are judicial: the summonses it files, the judgments it enforces, and appellate decisions like Conway. New York consumers with a grievance can complain to the New York Attorney General, the New York State Department of Financial Services, and, for New York City residents, the Department of Consumer and Worker Protection, which licenses debt collectors, along with the CFPB.
Source: Better Business Bureau complaints page.
Your Legal Rights When ARS Is Collecting
- FDCPA (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act): Governs ARS on consumer debts, barring harassment, false threats, third-party disclosure, suing on time-barred debt, and misrepresenting a balance, and entitling you to validation, with damages up to $1,000 plus actual damages and attorney fees. See our FDCPA page.
- New York CPLR Article 52: Governs judgment enforcement, including restraining notices, income executions, and the exemptions that protect your accounts and wages.
- Exempt Income Protection Act: Automatically shields a baseline bank balance and exempts Social Security, SSI, veterans benefits, pensions, and similar income from levy.
- TCPA (Telephone Consumer Protection Act): Restricts automated and recorded calls to your cell without consent, which you can revoke, and carries $500 to $1,500 per illegal call. See our TCPA page.
- FCRA (Fair Credit Reporting Act): Protects you from inaccurate reporting and requires a 30-day dispute investigation. See our collection laws for each state page for more.
The Accounts Retrievable System Violation Comparison
| Violation | Example in a New York Collection | Statute | Remedy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threatening seizure before a judgment | Warning it will garnish wages without a court judgment | FDCPA §807 | Up to $1,000 per violation |
| Restraining or levying exempt funds | Freezing Social Security or a protected bank balance | FDCPA §808; NY CPLR 5222-a | Actual damages; release of funds |
| Suing on a time-barred consumer debt | Filing after New York’s 3-year limit | FDCPA §807; §808 | Up to $1,000 plus dismissal |
| Sewer service leading to a default | Failing to serve you, then taking a default judgment | FDCPA §807; NY law | Vacatur; damages |
| Disclosing the debt to a third party | Telling a relative about the balance | FDCPA §805(b) | Up to $1,000 per violation |
| Repeated calls to harass | More than 7 calls in 7 days on one account | FDCPA §806; Reg. F, 12 C.F.R. §1006.14 | Presumption of harassment; up to $1,000 |
| Misstating the amount or assignment | Claiming an unverified balance or ownership | FDCPA §807(2) | Up to $1,000 per violation |
| Automated call to a cell without consent | A robocall to your mobile number | TCPA, 47 U.S.C. §227 | $500 to $1,500 per call |
Can You Sue The Accounts Retrievable System for Harassment?
Yes, and you can also fight back inside its own case. Where the FDCPA applies, you may recover up to $1,000 in statutory damages plus any actual harm, with the agency paying your attorney fees, and New York law gives you tools to release frozen exempt funds and to vacate an improper default. Each unauthorized robocall to your cell adds $500 to $1,500 under the TCPA. When ARS sues on a debt it cannot document or that is time-barred, or freezes protected income, that conduct can support both a defense and a claim.
You do not need a catastrophic loss to proceed. A premature seizure threat, a levy on exempt Social Security, a suit on a stale account, or a debt disclosed to your family can each anchor a case. Because these laws shift fees to the collector at fault, we handle the work with nothing owed by you up front.
What To Do Next: 6 Steps to Handle The Accounts Retrievable System
Step 1: Answer any lawsuit before the deadline. If you were served, file a written response with the court to preserve your defenses and stop a default judgment.
Step 2: Claim your exemptions fast. If a bank account is frozen, identify exempt income and file an exemption claim to release protected funds; for a wage garnishment, confirm the legal cap.
Step 3: Check the clock and demand validation. Compare the debt to New York’s three-year consumer limit, and send a debt validation letter requiring proof of the balance and the assignment chain.
Step 4: Preserve every document. Keep the summons, any judgment, restraining notices, income executions, and your call log, since enforcement disputes turn on the paperwork.
Step 5: Send a cease-and-desist for the calls. After ARS receives a written cease-and-desist letter, further calls become separate violations, though a cease letter will not stop a lawsuit or enforcement already underway.
Step 6: Report it and call a consumer attorney. File with the New York Attorney General, the CFPB, and the FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov, then call Consumer Rights Law Firm PLLC at (877) 700-5790 or request a free case review. If the agency broke the law, the fees fall on it, so you pay nothing.
Consumer Rights Law Firm PLLC
Consumer Rights Law Firm PLLC helps New Yorkers who are sued, garnished, or frozen out of their accounts by judgment collectors like The Accounts Retrievable System. Rather than face a summons or a bank restraint alone, let our office take it from here. We have represented consumers since 2010 and hold an A+ rating with the Better Business Bureau.
To learn how to protect yourself from The Accounts Retrievable System, call (877) 700-5790 or visit our website.
Success Stories
- Iâm extremely grateful for the support and guidance I received throughout my case. From start to finish, the team was professional, responsive, and truly cared about my situation. Thanks to their hard work, my case was resolved completely in my favor without any repayment or attorney fees was guaranteed no money payback out of pocket I would highly recommend them to anyone in need of honest and effective legal assistance.
- Amazing working with Matt G. He handled my case quickly and with ease. I got my debt and attorney fees taken care of and off my report. Matt was great at communicating and always made me feel heard. Couldnât recommend him more!
- I am incredibly grateful to Consumer Rights Law Firm, especially Scott. Initially, I was skeptical because I’m always cautious, but they never asked for any money and were upfront with all the details. I didn’t pay a dime, and the matter was quickly resolved. When Scott called to tell me it was resolved, my response was, “Wow! That was fast!”. I felt relieved. Scott is extremely professional and knowledgeable, making this process so easy. They followed through with everything we discussed, and it was all done in a short period of time. I can’t thank them enough for resolving this matter. I highly recommend Consumer Rights Law Firm.



